Since I have a swanky new “Deep Shiznazz” section, I thought I might as well use it. I am afterall in a bloggy mood, something I haven’t been in for several months. So here goes.
Morality is something that gets bandied about a lot these days. Not morality itself obviously, being conceptual in nature, it would be impressive if someone could actually bandy it about.
What I mean is that everyone uses the word morality in their agenda. And no one ever seems prepared to admit that morality is purely subjective and ever shifting. Everyone seems convinced it is some kind of absolute, something unchangable and concrete.
When the yanks want to justify their invasion of Iraq, they quote morality. Saddam was immoral, he was evil. When the Islamic radicals want to justify their attacks on Americans they also quote morality. Americans are immoral, they are evil. Both sets of people are pretty convinced they are right and the other is wrong. Yet, being conceptual, how can morality ever be anything other than subjective? The very fact that it only exists within our minds means that its meaning is shaped by our minds. Which means that to every different person to a greater or lesser extent, morality means something different, and when cultural differences are greater, so too is the concept of morality.
Religious people like to say that morality is something ordained and handed down to us by God, that without God (by whatever name you call him) there is no morality. I use Christianity as an example here because it is the religion I am most familiar with. Chrisitans cherry pick which parts of the Bible they adhere to. For example, there are many parts of the bible that condone slavery, murder and a myriad of other nasty things that in our modern society are considered immoral. Now the very fact that Christians choose to ignore these parts of the Bible indicates that they get their sense of morality from some OTHER source, namely society itself. Over the hundreds of years of our society certain practices have become seen as distasteful, and later immoral. Equally certain practices have gone from being the height of evil to acceptable. Society evolves and changes because of people’s ever shifting ideas and situations. It is a complex dance that takes generations, and is a testament to how interconnected we all really are.
Which is why our morality here in the western world is different from other culture’s morality. You see, there is no Right and Wrong. there is only what is socially acceptable and unacceptable. Its a finely detailed sketch in greyscale, ratehr than a simplistic illustration in black and white. People who say “society has lost its sense of morality” speak nonsense, because society and its norms and practices are what dictates what is moral. It’s not that we have become immoral, its just that standards for morality are shifting.
Homosexuality for example is something that many conservatives and religious folk brand immoral. It is wrong; the Bible says so. the Bible of course also says that people who work on the Sabbath should be stoned to death. Yet this facet of Bible brand morality is not so hotly adhered to. Why? Because our society moved away from seeing stoning people for working on the sabbath as an acceptable practice many hundreds of years ago. It is now socially accepted that working on the sabbath is ok. However, acceptance of homosexuals is still relatively new, only a few generations old really. In a hundred years people will look back and think we were savages for condemning homosexuals as immoral in the same way that we look back at the witch hunts and think the inquisitors were savages for carrying out God’s will to suffer not witches to live, by burning every poor woman who happened to have a wart on her nose or who could tell the difference between poisonous mushrooms and happy mushrooms.
Our social morality is what shapes our religious morality, not the other way around. Otherwise we’d be neck high in slaves and people being stoned.
Enough ranting for today, who knows if I am lucky I might get shouted down (figuratively) by some fanatic. Never argue with fanatics, because they aren’t listening. You can’t debate with someone who has already made up his mind, you can only make him look stupid so other people won’t join him in his opinion.
Back to PDP.